NH1 News Debates


Sep 25, 2014 5:56 PM

Oil industry offers crude-train testing standards

The Associated Press

BILLINGS, Mont. (AP) The oil industry's lead trade group released new standards on Thursday for testing and classifying crude shipped by rail after prior shipments were misclassified, including a train that derailed in Canada and killed 47 people.

As with earlier orders from the federal government, the industry standards leave it to individual companies to decide how often to test crude in order to gauge its danger.

The American Petroleum Institute said the standards were crafted in cooperation with regulators and the rail industry.

Shipping oil by rail has become far more common as domestic drilling booms in North Dakota, Montana, Texas, Colorado and other states.

In July 2013, a crude train from North Dakota derailed and exploded in Lac-Megantic, Quebec, killing 47. The shipment had been misclassified as posing a low risk, regulators said.

American Petroleum Institute President Jack Gerard said the testing and classification standards were part of a broad effort to reduce the number of oil-train accidents. Since Lac-Megantic, there have been at least six major oil-train derailments in the U.S. and Canada.

A U.S. Department of Transportation spokesman said the agency had collaborated with the petroleum association but was still reviewing the final proposal. The agency said in a statement that the industry standards represent "a step in the right direction to advance the safe transportation of crude oil."

The Association of American Railroads supports the testing standards, spokesman Ed Greenberg said. The group representing major Canadian and U.S. railroads recently reported almost 230,000 carloads of crude moved in the U.S. during the first six months of 2014, a 12 percent increase versus the same period in 2013.

Environmental groups two weeks ago sued the Transportation Department for allowing companies to continue using older, rupture-prone tank cars to move volatile crude from the Bakken oil region of the Northern Plains. Attorney Kristen Boyles with the law firm EarthJustice, which represents the plaintiffs in the case, said the industry's testing standards could make those shipments safer, but more is needed.

"The safest and most straightforward response to exploding oil trains is not to ship Bakken crude in unsafe tank cars," Boyles said.

The government has proposed phasing out the older tank cars, although critics assert that will take too long.

Hazardous-materials shipments are supposed to be classified into one of nine categories depending on the risk involved. If the materials are misclassified, they could wind up being shipped in less protective rail tank cars, and emergency personnel might follow the wrong protocols when responding to a spill.

The oil in the train that derailed in Lac-Megantic was misclassified as "packing group III," which the Department of Transportation equates to minor danger.

Oil can no longer be shipped using that less protective category of safety requirements under an emergency order in February from U.S. Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx. As a result, the fuel could no longer be carried by tank cars that lack certain safety features.

That included only about 3 percent of the total crude fleet, and it did not restrict oil companies from continuing to ship oil using tens of thousands of tank cars that were identified decades ago as a potential safety risk.

In February, federal regulators said they would pursue fines against Hess, Marathon Oil and Whiting for failing to properly classify their oil.


--  Dealing with the Disease of Addiction? Click here for help --

More from NH1.com

NH1 News Debates
NH1 News Replay

NH1 on Twitter

NH1 SkyView Cameras

NH1 on Facebook

Check out NH1 News Rail Polls on LockerDome on LockerDome